February 2004
Special Focus

United States: 2004 E&P spending

Higher oil/gas prices boost spending
 
Vol. 225 No. 2

OUTLOOK 2004: United States
E&P Spending

Higher oil/gas prices boost spending

Geoff Kieburtz, Andrew Hoffman, W. Michael McNair and Megan L. Bissell, Citigroup Smith Barney, New York

The Smith Barney division of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Smith Barney (CSB), published its 22nd annual E&P Spending Survey on December 12. The 36-page report involving 224 oil/gas operating companies analyzes reported spending for 2003 and plans for 2004, focusing on the US, Canada and outside North America. The data comprises 50 tables and figures, plus CSB's commentary, survey highlights, the survey process and results, and oil/gas company observations.

The authors say the survey, encompassing nearly $149 billion of global upstream spending, indicates 2004 E&P spending growth of 4.4%. This follows an estimated 9.4% increase in 2003, revised from the year-ago forecast of 3.8% due to incremental growth in all markets, compounded by the weaker US dollar. Respondents assumed a $25.68/bbl oil price for 2004, 27% above the 15-year average, but 14% below December's futures strip of $29.88/bbl. Gas price is assumed to be $4.39/Mcf, 75% above the 15-year average, but 17% below the futures strip of $5.32/Mcf.

North American spending is forecast to rise by just 0.7%. For the second straight year, North American operators have budgeted for limited US and Canadian growth. International spending is projected to rise by 6.4%. Based on the relative constancy of the majors' spending plans, and projections of strong growth in Latin America, China and India, International spending is expected to continue its upward trajectory. Typically, such spending plans have more stability than those in North America. Oil and gas price sensitivities are very similar to a year ago, indicating material upside potential to the survey indication of 0.7% North American spending growth, and to a lesser extent, 6.4% international growth. Consequently, the authors are maintaining their base-case growth forecast of 6 – 8%.

Survey highlights. This year's survey of worldwide E&P expenditures indicates that respondents plan a 4.4% increase in 2004 spending, compared to a 9.4% increase in 2003, and the 20-year high of 24.8% in 2001. A year ago, 2003 spending was forecast at 3.8%; however, actual growth was stronger in all geographic regions due to higher-than-anticipated oil and gas prices and, secondarily, the weaker US dollar. Currency effects may have inflated spending growth by about one percentage point.

During 2003, the worldwide rig count rose by 19%, but this was heavily skewed toward the less service revenue-intensive North American land drilling market. In fact, the US land and Canadian rig counts were expected to be up 29% and 41%, respectively, at year end, countering a 4% decline in the Gulf of Mexico. In international markets, rig count was up 8% and the offshore count down 1%. A significant offshore bright spot was Mexico which, during 2003, accounted for nearly 40% of total growth in international E&P spending.

In 2004, CSB anticipates 7% growth in the worldwide rig count, but with a more balanced mix of onshore and offshore, domestic and international. As opposed to 2003, international growth is expected to be more diversified. In addition to Mexico, solid growth is expected in China, India, Brazil and Venezuela.

Combined, the 224 companies surveyed plan worldwide E&P expenditures of $148.9 billion, up 4.4% from the $142.6 billion level now forecast for 2003. Of the planned spending, 67% is earmarked for international markets, 22% for the US and 11% for Canada. Notably, the actual percentage of international spending is greater than 67%, as the large majority of the spending not included in the survey comes from OPEC nations such as Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia, where reliable data has not been available. The survey data does not include acquisitions; historical numbers have been adjusted to reflect acquisitions as if they had occurred at the beginning of the survey period.

US majors. The eight firms designated as major oil companies plan to decrease US spending by 2.0% in 2004, to $13.7 billion. Over the past few years, this group has continued to de-emphasize US operations in favor of more prospective deepwater and international opportunities, particularly related to development of major discoveries. These companies divested a significant number of US properties during the late 1990s, but have slowed this pace in the past two years.

CSB expects a continuation of this international trend over time – except in prospective regions such as the deepwater Gulf of Mexico – as well as increasingly stable and inelastic spending budgets. In the US, one notable 2004 change will be a reduction in BP's spending due to a peak in its capex profile – caused by the timing of its Thunder Horse/ Atlantis/ Mad Dog/ Holstein developments.

   2003 – 2004 US expenditures by major oil & gas
companies, $ millions*
  
   Company   2004   2003   
  
  
   Amerada Hess $320  $280    
   BP 3,800 4,160   
   ChevronTexaco 1,770 1,700   
   ConocoPhillips 1,900 1,900   
   ExxonMobil 3,000 3,100   
   Marathon Oil Corp. 450 440   
   Occidental Petroleum Corp. 505 496   
   Royal Dutch Shell 1,450 1,450   
  
  
   Total   $13,695    $13,976    
   Change –2.0%      
   *Citigroup Smith Barney estimate.

US independents. In the US, the 132 independents surveyed plan a 2.4% increase in 2004 upstream expenditures, to $19.6 billion. This compares to 8.2% growth in 2003 and a 15.5% decline in 2002. Despite historically high oil and gas prices, 2004 spending plans are very modest. Energy merchants such as El Paso and Dominion, traditionally among the largest market participants, continue to be constrained by cash flow issues, while the remaining group of independents continue to be broadly conservative. Weak balance sheets, war and economic uncertainty were significant wild cards a year ago, but are not so today, in CSB's view. Thus, it believes the initially conservative forecasts are principally due to declining North American prospects, and secondarily, a heightened emphasis on investment returns.

In the coming year, the largest spending increase, of just $185 million, is projected to emanate from EnCana. Other significant spending increases, on an absolute basis, are projected from Williams Production and Westport Resources. Notably, most of the large independents such as Apache, Devon and Burlington Resources are, at best, projecting very modest growth. Conversely, large declines are anticipated from El Paso, Kerr McGee and Dominion. On a percentage basis, the largest increases by far emanate from the smallest independents.

Aggregate US spending (Majors and Independents) is forecast to increase by 0.6% in 2004, to $33.3 billion, compared to a 4.1% rise in 2002. Of the 40 respondents, 59% expect higher spending, 22% expect lower spending and 19% expect no change. Much of the growth is coming from small, incremental increases at a large number of companies.

   2003 – 2004 US expenditures by independents,
$ millions*
  
   Company   2004   2003   

   ABARTA Oil & Gas $9  $9    
   Abraxas Petroleum Corp. 4 9   
   Adams Resources 5 5   
   Adexco Operating Co. 1 1   
   AEDC (USA) Inc. 1 2   
   Agip (ENI) S.p.A 245 300   
   American Shoreline Inc. 8 10   
   Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 1,700 1,652   
   Apache Corp. 450 450   
   AROC Inc. 1 6   
   Aspen Exploration Corp. 7 6   
   Aspen Group Resources 2 2   
   Aspen Integrated Oil & Gas 1 1   
   ATP Oil & Gas 50 55   
   Barrow-Shaver Resources Co. 5 5   
   Belden & Blake Corp. 35 40   
   Berry Petroleum Co. 52 45   
   Beta Oil & Gas Co. 3 3   
   BHP Petroleum 350 400   
   BreitBurn Energy 30 28   
   BRG Petroleum Corp. 10 10   
   Brigham Exploration Co. 75 44   
   Burlington Resources 425 407   
   Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. 169 176   
   Callon Petroleum Co. 50 50   
   Calpine Natural Gas Co. 71 80   
   Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. 27 23   
   Century Offshore Management Corp. 44 39   
   Chaparral Energy Inc. 27 24   
   Cheniere Energy, Inc.
  (Gryphon Exploration)
67 51   
   Chesapeake Energy Corp. 700 652   
   Chief Petroleum Co. 1 0   
   Cimarex Energy Co. 185 152   
   Clayton Williams Energy Inc. 80 76   
   Comstock Resources 120 100   
   Contango Oil & Gas 25 20   
   Cummings Oil Co. 8 4   
   Daniel Exploration 1 1   
   Daugherty Resources, Inc. 36 24   
   Denbury Resources 145 140   
   Devon Energy Corp. 1,416 1,420   
   Dewbre Petroleum Corp. 11 9   
   Diaz Resources 1 1   
   Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc. 882 1,023   
   Company 2004 2003   
   Double Eagle Petroleum & 10 5   
   Mining Co.         
   DTE Gas & Oil Co. 26 27   
   Edge Petroleum Corp. 30 24   
   El Paso Energy Corp. 640 1,180   
   El Paso JV 450 50   
   EnCana Corp. 925 740   
   Energen Corp. 107 127   
   Energy Partners 125 110   
   EOG Resources Inc. 725 725   
   Equitable Resources 110 102   
   Evergreen Resources Inc. 186 167   
   EXCO Resources Inc. 18 10   
   Forest Oil Corp. 295 295   
   Gasco Energy 20 5   
   Geo Resources Inc. 1 1   
   GMX Resources -- 1   
   Goodrich Petroleum 20 20   
   Hallador Petroleum Co. 4 4   
   Harken Energy Corp. 1 1   
   Houston Exploration Co. 315 312   
   Inland Resources 18 18   
   Ivanhoe Energy 12 10   
   J.M. Huber 99 96   
   J.P. Oil Company Inc. 3 3   
   KCS Energy Inc. 85 75   
   Kerr-McGee Corp. 500 700   
   Kinloch Resources Inc. 6 3   
   Lario Oil & Gas Co. 8 9   
   Magnum Hunter Resources Inc. 150 165   
   Mariner Energy Inc. 90 85   
   McMoRan Exploration Co. 55 --   
   Meridian Resources Corp. 74 69   
   Merit Energy Co. 88 72   
   Merrion Oil & Gas Corp. 8 7   
   Mission Resources 34 32   
   Murphy Oil Corp. 190 300   
   National Energy Group 40 40   
   Newfield Exploration Co. 520 500   
   Nexcore Energy 4 2   
   Nexen Inc. 270 260   
   Noble Energy 243 235   
   Norsk Hydro ASA 42 40   
   North Coast Energy Inc. 18 16   
   Nuevo Energy Co. 65 60   
   ONEOK Inc. 10 10   
   Osprey Energy Ltd. 5 5   
   Company 2004 2003   
   Panhandle Royalty Co. 10 9   
   Parallel Petroleum Corp. 17 14   
   Patina Oil & Gas Corp. 200 165   
   Penn Virginia Corp. 95 100   
   PetroGlobe Inc. 7 0   
   Petroglyph Energy Inc. 26 26   
   Petroleo Brasiliero S.A. 100 80   
   (Petrobras)         
   PetroQuest Energy, Inc. 40 30   
   Pioneer Natural Resources Co. 292 308   
   Pogo Producing Co. 213 213   
   Prima Energy Corp. 35 30   
   PYR Energy Corp. 5 --   
   Questar Corp. 187 180   
   Quicksilver Resources Inc. 49 62   
   Range Resources Corp. 115 105   
   Remington Oil and Gas Corp. 125 114   
   Repsol S.A. 6 6   
   Seneca Resources Corp. 54 44   
   Shamrock Resources Inc.
  (Pacific Energy Resource)
5 2   
   Southwestern Energy Co. 194 162   
   Spinnaker Exploration Co. 250 275   
   St. Mary Land & Exploration Co. 165 143   
   Stone Energy Corp. 275 290   
   Swift Energy Co. 105 125   
   Talisman Energy Inc. 75 47   
   The Cumming Co. 4 2   
   Thunder Energy Inc. 50 53   
   Tom Brown Inc. 280 220   
   Trek Resources 1 1   
   Ultra Petroleum Corp. 150 110   
   Unit Corp. 93 73   
   United States Exploration Inc. 5 5   
   Unocal Corp. 568 638   
   Vintage Petroleum Inc. 99 75   
   Ward Petroleum Corp. 15 12   
   WBI Holdings, Inc. 140 123   
   Western Gas Resources 119 77   
   Westport Resources 370 270   
   Whiting Petroleum Corp. 70 40   
   Williams Production Co. 327 159   
   Woodside Petroleum Ltd. 30 27   
   XTO Energy 460 450   

   Total   $19,605    $19,136    
   Change 2.4%      
   *Citigroup Smith Barney estimate: -- is no spending,
  0 is some spending; but less than $0.5 million
  

In Canada, 80 companies plan a 1.0% spending increase in 2003, to $15.6 billion, following 31.7% growth in 2003 – half of which was likely due to the sharp increase in the Canadian dollar value, relative to the US dollar. The same prospectivity factors affecting US drilling plans are applicable in Canada, validated by the fact that just 23% of Canadian respondents plan to outspend cash flow in 2003 – in line with the response from US independents. This would represent the lowest percentage in a decade.

M&A activity declined significantly, yielding a market dominated by several large Independents. Thus, CSB expects more inelastic spending plans than in past years, though not nearly to the extent of the much larger integrated majors. Notably, oil sands are becoming a significant area of Canadian spending growth which, as a whole, has relatively low oil service intensity. However, in coming years, most new oil sands projects are anticipated to be steam-assisted gravity drainage which, generally speaking, is far more service intensive than strip mining.

   2003 – 2004 Canadian E&P expenditures, $ millions*   
   Company 2004 2003   
   Abraxas Petroleum Corp. $4  $9    
   Acclaim Energy Trust 32 28   
   Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 440 441   
   Apache Corp. 450 450   
   Arc Resources 126 108   
   Barnwell of Canada 12 12   
   Baytex Energy 80 135   
   BlackRock Ventures Inc. 35 27   
   Bonavista Petroleum Ltd. 100 95   
   Bonterra Energy 6 3   
   BP 80 115   
   Burlington Resources 660 625   
   Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. 9 3   
   Calpine Natural Gas Co. 49 50   
   Canadian 88 Energy Corp. 100 85   
   Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. 1,360 1,285   
   Canadian Superior Energy 35 20   
   Cavell Energy 16 31   
   ChevronTexaco 395 380   
   Compton Petroleum Corp. 120 120   
   Connacher Oil & Gas Ltd. 33 27   
   ConocoPhillips 360 320   
   Corridor Resources -- 2   
   Defiant Energy Corp. 30 36   
   Devon Energy Corp. 696 680   
   Diaz Resources 4 4   
   Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc. 84 92   
   Drilcorp Energy Ltd. 2 1   
   Dynamic Oil & Gas Corp. 22 21   
   El Paso Energy Corp. 40 50   
   EnCana Corp. 2,310 2,240   
   Enerplus Resources Corp. 115 115   
   EOG Resources Inc. 170 170   
   Equatorial Energy  39 47   
    (Resolute Energy)      
   Eurogas Corp. 4 4   
   Evergreen Resources Inc. 34 9   
   EXCO Resources Inc. 34 30   
   ExxonMobil 1,150 1,150   
   Find Energy 23 17   
   Company 2004 2003   
   Forest Oil Corp. 30 30   
   Gentry Resources 11 13   
   Globex Resources Co. 5 5   
   Husky Energy Inc. 1,165 1,120   
   Imperial Oil Ltd. 700 750   
   J.M. Huber 6 5   
   Lario Oil & Gas Co. 4 5   
   Marathon Oil Corp. -- 50   
   Merit Energy Co. 2 2   
   Murphy Oil Corp. 265 260   
   Nexen Inc. 440 358   
   Norsk Hydro ASA 83 80   
   Olympia Energy Inc. 38 38   
   Paramount Resources Ltd. 225 175   
   Pengrowth Energy Trust 90 54   
   Penn West Petroleum Ltd. 420 460   
   Petrobank Energy and Resources 20 30   
   Petro-Canada 815 815   
   Petrovera Resources 90 124   
   Pioneer Natural Resources Co. 27 29   
   Prime West 61 76   
   Purcell Energy 35 28   
   Quicksilver Resources Inc. 105 52   
   Raven Energy Ltd. 10 10   
   Real Resources 41 43   
   Rocky Mountain Energy Corp. 10 10   
   Rosetta Exploration 4 3   
   RSX Energy Inc. 9 8   
   Seneca Resources Corp. 38 31   
   Seventh Energy 8 9   
   Shell Canada Ltd. 400 350   
   Storm Energy Ltd. 23 18   
   Suncor Energy Inc. 143 135   
   Talisman Energy Inc. 810 830   
   Tempest Energy Corp. 38 34   
   Terraquest Energy Corp. 4 4   
   Tom Brown Inc. 30 31   
   TriQuest Energy 24 18   
   True Energy Inc. 13 13   
   Unocal Corp. 116 130   
   Vintage Petroleum Inc. 22 38   
   Total $15,636  $15,489    
   Change 1.0%      
   *Citigroup Smith Barney estimate: -- is no spending;
  0 is some spending, but less than $0.5 million
  

International. Outside North America, the 85 companies surveyed plan a 2004 spending increase of 6.4%, to $100 billion from $94 billion, compared to an 8.2% increase in 2003 and 10.7% growth in 2002. Excluding Pemex of Mexico, estimated 2003 spending growth was just 5%, and will be the same in 2004, reflecting a broadening of spending growth in international markets, as Pemex accounted for nearly 40% of spending growth in 2003, but is projected to account for less than 20% in 2004.

In total, Latin America is expected to account for 60% of 2004 spending growth, with relatively equal contributions from Pemex, Petrobras and PDVSA. Petrobras' growth is attributed to project timing and the acquisition of Perez Companc, while PDVSA's is largely due to the sharp reduction in 2003 resulting from the first quarter strike. Other companies expecting significant international spending increases are CNOOC, Petrochina, Yukos, BP/TNK, and ONGC. The largest declines are projected from BHP Petroleum, Agip and Lukoil.

   2003 – 2004 International (outside North America)
E&P expenditures, $ millions*
  
   Company 2004 2003   

   Agip (ENI) S.p.A $2,300  $2,800    
   Amerada Hess Corp. 1,250 1,170   
   Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 160 188   
   Antrim Energy Inc. 10 3   
   Apache Corp. 700 500   
   ATP Oil & Gas 20 15   
   BG Group Plc 815 1,000   
   BHP Petroleum 535 1,185   
   BP 5,200 5,225   
   BP/TNK 800 560   
   Burlington Resources Ltd. 315 270   
   Cairn Energy Plc 170 170   
   Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. 520 360   
   Canadian Superior Energy 8 1   
   Centurion Energy International Inc. 48 24   
   CEPSA 85 93   
   ChevronTexaco 4,490 4,320   
   CNOOC 1,840 1,400   
   CNPC 69 94   
   Connacher Oil & Gas Ltd. 1 3   
   ConocoPhillips 2,140 2,180   
   Contango Oil & Gas 2 --   
   Continental Energy Corp. 5 4   
   Devon Energy Corp. 288 285   
   El Paso Energy Corp. 40 50   
   EnCana Corp. 580 740   
   EOG Resources Inc. 100 55   
   Eurogas Corp. 5 3   
   Evergreen Resources Inc. -- 3   
   ExxonMobil 6,850 6,750   
   Forest Oil Corp. 15 15   
   Gazprom 3,366 3,032   
   Harken Energy Corp. 3 3   
   Harvest Natural Resources 33 50   
   Husky Energy Inc. 40 38   
   Ivanhoe Energy 8 3   
   Kerr-McGee Corp. 300 300   
   Lukoil 1,310 2,144   
   Marathon Oil Corp. 650 745   
   Medco Energy 154 149   
   MOL 196 140   
   Murphy Oil Corp. 280 270   
   New Horizon Exploration Inc. 6 6   
   Company 2004 2003   
   Newfield Exploration Co. 30 10   
   Nexen Inc. 380 285   
   Niko Resources 70 75   
   Noble Energy 277 275   
   Norsk Hydro ASA 1,800 1,730   
   Nuevo Energy Co. 5 4   
   Occidental Petroleum Corp. 775 757   
   OMV AG 392 331   
   ONGC 707 495   
   Paladin Resources 126 120   
   PDVSA 5,800 4,300   
   Pertamina 588 259   
   Petrobank Energy and Resources 20 52   
   Petro-Canada 535 535   
   PetroChina 5,435 5,070   
   Petroleo Brasiliero S.A. (Petrobras) 5,127 4,030   
   Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 11,000 9,800   
   Petronas 2,000 2,000   
   Petrotrin Corp. 276 220   
   Pioneer Natural Resources Co. 180 190   
   Pogo Producing Co. 142 142   
   Premier Oil plc 72 65   
   PTTEP 308 207   
   Reliance Industries 796 708   
   Repsol S.A. 1,800 1,800   
   Royal Dutch/Shell 6,050 6,050   
   Sheer Energy Inc. 8 1   
   Sibneft 935 959   
   Sinopec 2,415 2,174   
   Statoil 3,400 3,100   
   Surgutneftegaz 1,910 1,895   
   Swift Energy Co. 25 25   
   Taftneft 415 415   
   Talisman Energy Inc. 905 875   
   Total 5,500 5,550   
   Ultra Petroleum Corp. 25 20   
   Unocal Corp. 1,254 920   
   Vaalco Energy Inc. 11 2   
   Vintage Petroleum Inc. 119 72   
   Williams Production Co. 13 7   
   Woodside Petroleum Ltd. 850 735   
   Yukos 1,775 1,349   
  
  
   Total   $99,957    $93,952    
   Change 6.4%      
   *Citigroup Smith Barney estimate: -- is no spending;
   0 is some spending, but less than $0.5 million
  

Some key observations. These selected additional points of interest emerged from the survey, in addition to the preceding analyses:

  • The leading drivers of upstream spending are expected to be operating cash flow, the availability of attractive drilling prospects and energy prices. Some 55% of the respondents cited these factors, while 42% cited targeted production growth. Availability of capital continued to be a relatively minor consideration, likely due to the extended period of high oil/gas prices over the past five years.
  • The average oil price assumption for 2004 spending plans is $25.68/bbl, up more than $2.00 from a year ago and at the highest level in the survey's history. Similarly, the average long-term oil price expectation rose to $24.55/bbl from $22.49 a year ago, a nearly 10% increase. This suggests that the high oil prices of late 2000 were deemed to be more temporary than the present, and could cause several projects that were previously viewed as uneconomic to become viable.
  • Regarding gas prices, the average planning assumption of $4.39/Mcf rose by 24% from last year's $3.55, and is 14% above the previous survey record of $3.86 in December 2000. Even the majors increased their assumption by 17%, to $3.85/Mcf from $3.29, in CSB's view due to sharply higher finding and development costs. The long-term gas price assumptions also rose sharply, to $4.21/Mcf from $3.61 a year ago and $4.42 in December 2000. As the current futures strip is $5.32, it would appear that initial budgeting assumptions are quite conservative.
  • For the first time in three years, about the same amount of respondents expect to shift their focus to oil-related projects as gas-related projects. However, these expectations are quite different among the three respondent regions. In the US, 27% expect to shift toward oil compared to 19% that plan to shift toward gas. Conversely, Canadian respondents continue to focus on gas, with more than three times as many shifting toward gas as toward oil. Outside North America, as usual, significantly more respondents are shifting toward oil-related projects, likely because most markets do not have the infrastructure to support gas consumption.
  • The shift toward exploration that commenced a year ago appears to be gaining momentum, as 34% expect to move toward exploration in 2004, vs. 19% planning to shift toward development. Consistent with this shift, twice the number expect to increase spending on lease expenditures as those that expect to reduce lease expenditures. And, for the second straight year, three times more respondents expect to increase seismic budgets than those that expect to decrease.
  • For the second straight year, respondents deemed the economics of drilling to be more favorable than those of acquiring reserves. In light of the run-up in both oil and gas prices, acquisition prices have clearly increased significantly. However, the percentage seeking to purchase reserves (70%) was about flat with responses of the past three years, with a clear bias toward acquiring gas.
  • North America is where respondents see the most potential. After two years of waning attraction, interest in the Gulf of Mexico and the US is on the rise, with 75% listing it as one of its top three focus regions. These results are heavily skewed by US independents, 92% of which listed their home regions. Europe was not listed as a major focus area, while interest has grown modestly in Russia, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. Only 6% listed Africa as a primary focus, likely driven by continued political turmoil and instability in the region.
  • With historically high commodity prices, respondents are incredibly optimistic about the future. In particular, optimism about the oil-intensive international markets is back to 2000's level of 100%, but it has remained above 95% for the past five years as OPEC's production discipline has remained strong. In the gas-intensive US, optimism grew from 92% last year to 98% this year.

Note: CSB cautions that, since actual companies surveyed vary from year to year, it is not statistically accurate to compare total estimates with those from prior-year surveys.  WO


Related Articles FROM THE ARCHIVE
Connect with World Oil
Connect with World Oil, the upstream industry's most trusted source of forecast data, industry trends, and insights into operational and technological advances.