May 2020
Features

Shaletech: Improving fracturing in clay-rich ductile shales

Fractures in clay-rich shales tend to be short, with smaller surface areas that can negatively affect fluid flow. To improve understanding of fracture performance in these shales, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, with funding from the U.S. DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory, conducted two-phase research to investigate and understand how fracture characteristics affect production performance.
Jared Ciferno / National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy

Hydraulic fracturing is an indispensable tool for enhancing permeability of otherwise very impermeable shales containing oil and gas. However, clay-rich, ductile shales are difficult to fracture, and the hydraulic fractures created in the rock tend to be short and have a smaller surface area. Also, proppant placed in these fractures tends to be embedded in the soft fracture walls, and the open space created by the fracture can be filled by mobilized clay minerals and by the expanded fracture walls, if swelling clays (e.g., smectites, mixed-layer illites) are present in the rock. 

To improve understanding of fracture performance in clay-rich, ductile shales, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory, NETL) conducted a two-phase research program to investigate and understand 1) how hydraulic fractures produced in ductile shale behave over time to reduce in aperture and permeability; 2) how the proppant deposition characteristics (e.g., mono-layer vs multi-layer), grain size, and spatial distribution (isolated patches vs. connected strings and networks) affect the sustainability of the fracture conductivity impacted by fracture aperture reduction, resulting from rock deformation and clay mobilization, and (3) how the near-fracture shale-matrix fluid transport is affected by the evolving conductivity of the fracture.  

To meet these objectives, LBNL conducted core-scale laboratory experiments under controlled temperature and stress, using several available natural shale samples with different ductility and clay compositions. These experiments include baseline shale property characterization, micro-indentation tests, and optical (and some X-ray CT) visualization of shale fracture compaction, with and without proppants. Concurrently, numerical modeling of shale deformation and fracturing were performed, and prediction accuracy was checked against the laboratory experiments. 

The modeling employed either a discrete modeling method (TOUGH-RBSN) or a continuum modeling method (TOUGH-FLAC), depending upon the laboratory experiment being modeled and the involved physical processes. This two-year-long project produced new laboratory tools for investigating time-dependent deformation of shale fractures, with and without proppant. 

An in-house instrumented indentation test system was developed for single-proppant-scale study of shale mechanical properties, including short-duration viscoelastic deformation. A core-scale in-situ optical visualization test system was developed for studying long-duration (weeks to a month) shale fracture closure and proppant embedment, with concurrent direct deformation and hydrological (permeability) measurements. 

A new visualization technique using UV-induced fluorescence was developed, which allowed LBNL to obtain (quasi-) 3D images of fracture aperture distribution and proppant crushing. Using heavy krypton gas, invasion/migration of gas in partially saturated shale core was imaged using X-ray CT. Continuum-based TOUGH-FLAC was successfully applied to model multi-grain proppant embedment in ductile shale, using a special interface element. The method was also was applied to determine failure model parameters (Mohr-Coulomb) of shale from laboratory indentation experiments. 

Discrete-element-based TOUGH-RBSN was used successfully to examine proppant-shale interaction involving brittle fracturing. Although relative strengths of the shale and the proppant resulted in different fracturing behavior, as expected, shale matrix failure always seemed to occur, regardless of the proppant strength, possibly because of small tensile strength of rock compared to proppant grains. In this discussion, descriptions of the laboratory and numerical modelling tools and methodologies developed in this project are provided. The results of the experiments and simulations, and the knowledge gained from them, particularly the time-dependent behavior of shale fractures, are reported.  

IMPACT

The results of the Phase I effort increased understanding of how hydraulic fractures propagate in complex, anisotropic and heterogeneous shale to help optimize fracturing operations in the field, and subsequent oil and gas production. The results from this work have the potential to lead to 1) a reduction in the number of oil and gas wells required to develop the field; 2) a reduction in the total volume of fracturing fluid injected; and 3) mitigation of unexpected fracture propagation, which may cause a seal rock breach and/or fault activation. 

Results from the Phase II research effort expanded understanding of the relationships between the properties of “problematic,” ductile, and swelling-clay-rich shales and their impact on the time-dependent fluid/gas transport in the rock matrix and proppant-containing fractures. With this knowledge, and by choosing and controlling proppant types and emplacement strategy, hydraulic fractures with more sustainable permeability can be produced in currently underdeveloped shale hydrocarbon reservoirs.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Fig. 1. Analogue/rock samples prepared using the following techniques for producing pre-existing fractures: (a) 3D laser-engraved fractures; (b) Thermal-shrinkage-induced fractures; and (c) Phase-transition-induced cracks in granite (block on the right was heated above the α−ß quartz transition point).
Fig. 1. Analogue/rock samples prepared using the following techniques for producing pre-existing fractures: (a) 3D laser-engraved fractures; (b) Thermal-shrinkage-induced fractures; and (c) Phase-transition-induced cracks in granite (block on the right was heated above the α−ß quartz transition point).

In Phase I, a polyaxial loading frame and a triaxial pressure vessel were modified and implemented for optical and X-ray computed tomography (CT) visualization of hydraulic fracture propagation in laboratory experiments using 4-in. x 4-in. x 4-in. analogue (glass) and shale blocks. The triaxial pressure vessel for X-ray CT was modified with redesigned and fabricated platens to accommodate the shale blocks used in the experiments. The triaxial cell was pressure-tested and CT-imaged with a mock sample prior to experimentation.

Initial CT images indicated that low-density fluids, such as water, could not be visualized with good resolution. A low-viscosity liquid-metal was prepared as an alternative fracturing fluid to enhance x-ray contrast. Two techniques were developed for producing fractured natural and analogue rock samples: 1) fractures in quartz-rich polycrystalline rocks and analogue samples (glass blocks) were thermally produced by leveraging the differential thermal expansion between mineral grains or the rapid thermal shrinkage of heated glass; and 2) fractures in synthetic/analogue samples were created by laser-engraving  reproducible fracture geometries with variable fracture height and strength, based on engraving height and density. Using the described methods, experimental samples were prepared with multiple fracture densities and geometries, Fig. 1. 

Fig. 2. Hydraulic fractures (red) produced in analogue samples with pre-existing fracture networks (green): (a) Fracturing of the “standard” height reservoir model resulted in fracture propagation within the intact matrix; (b) Fracturing of the “tall” reservoir model resulted in fracture propagation that followed the pre-existing fracture; and (c) Fracturing of the “standard” reservoir model at high injection rate or with low-viscosity fluid resulted in induced hydraulic fractures that were not affected.
Fig. 2. Hydraulic fractures (red) produced in analogue samples with pre-existing fracture networks (green): (a) Fracturing of the “standard” height reservoir model resulted in fracture propagation within the intact matrix; (b) Fracturing of the “tall” reservoir model resulted in fracture propagation that followed the pre-existing fracture; and (c) Fracturing of the “standard” reservoir model at high injection rate or with low-viscosity fluid resulted in induced hydraulic fractures that were not affected.

Phase I fracture visualization experiments have been completed to investigate the impact of stress conditions, fluid injection rates and viscosities, and pre-existing fracture height and strength on hydraulic fracture development in analogue (glass) samples. Mancos shale blocks also were prepared for additional laboratory experiments, but the fracture visualization was ultimately unsuccessful due, to the limited resolution of the medical CT scanner used in this project. 

To enhance optical visualization of the thin fractures, a fluorescent dye was introduced with the fracturing fluids. Fracture development was optically visualized through a series of high-frame-rate cameras in the vertical and horizontal directions. An acoustic emission monitoring system was able to map the location of small seismic events associated with fracture propagation. Stress conditions were found to play a major role in fracture development, with fractures propagating perpendicular to the minimum, principal stress direction. The effect of pre-existing fracture height was found to influence hydraulic fracture propagation, with more extensive fracture activation in samples with taller pre-existing fracture networks, Fig. 2. 

Fig. 3. Hydraulic fracturing simulations of analogue samples showing (a) hydraulic fracture propagation less impacted by the pre-existing fracture network in the case of high-viscosity glycerol injection; and (b) hydraulic fracture propagation primarily activating pre-existing fractures when low-viscosity water is injected.
Fig. 3. Hydraulic fracturing simulations of analogue samples showing (a) hydraulic fracture propagation less impacted by the pre-existing fracture network in the case of high-viscosity glycerol injection; and (b) hydraulic fracture propagation primarily activating pre-existing fractures when low-viscosity water is injected.

Interpretation of the impact of pre-existing fracture strength was challenging, due to the formation of different fracture pathways in replicate experiments, but increased fracture interaction was observed with decreased fracture strength. The effect of fluid viscosity also was found to play a major role in fracture development. When injecting low-viscosity fluid (water), the fracture development was much more rapid than observed with the high-viscosity fluid (glycerol); furthermore, water injection resulted in hydraulic fractures that were minimally impacted by the preexisting fracture network, Fig. 2. Finally, injection of high-viscosity fluid at elevated injection rates indicated that higher injection rates lead to more rapid fracture propagation and the formation of fractures that are less affected by the preexisting fracture network, Fig. 2. 

The Transport of Unsaturated Groundwater and Heat–Rigid Body Spring Network (TOUGH-RBSN) code was modified and tested for Phase I hydraulic fracture propagation simulations in complex fractured rock. The elastic and strength anisotropy algorithms were tested and verified for modeling laboratory scale samples under compression. The numerical code was initially tested for fluid-driven fracture propagation of a single fracture, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine input parameters for the modeling experiments. A number of model grids were set up to represent the exact heterogeneity features of the 3D laser-engraved synthetic samples, Fig. 3.

 

Fig. 4. Instrumented laboratory micro-indention system.
Fig. 4. Instrumented laboratory micro-indention system.

Using field data from the Mont Terri hydraulic fracturing experiments, a field-scale hydraulic fracturing model was developed as part of the Phase I effort. The results show some deviation of the fracture propagation from the bedding plane orientation; the fractures tend to be oriented more toward the maximum stress. However, the Mont Terri hydraulic fracturing experiments exhibited complex behavior that was not captured in the model.

The Phase II research effort began on Oct. 1, 2016. In Phase II, laboratory activity focused on shale property characterization and fracture compaction visualization experiments. Initial laboratory work focused on the development of an instrumented micro-indention system for examining shale elastic-plastic properties and grain-scale deformation using small chips and cores, Fig. 4. A new LabView code was written for the micro-indention system, to allow semi-automated loading and unloading tests for a given set of predetermined test parameters.

Fig. 5. Design of the X-ray-transparent shale fracture compaction view cell.
Fig. 5. Design of the X-ray-transparent shale fracture compaction view cell.

Using the micro-indentation system and other laboratory equipment, shale property characterization and ductility measurements were completed on cores from the Barnett, Niobrara, Eagle Ford, Marcellus, and Mancos shales. The shale properties that were measured include material density, anisotropic seismic velocity, dynamic elastic moduli, mineral composition, Young’s modulus, hardness, and ductility index. Based on the results of the shale property characterization, clay-rich Barnett shale and Marcellus Shale samples from the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Laboratory (MSEEL) appeared best for investigating the impact of fracture deformation and proppant embedment on fracture permeability loss. The Mancos, Eagle Ford, Marcellus (outcrop), and Niobrara shales appear to be less sensitive to water and exhibit smaller ductility. 

Fig. 6. Optical images from initial shale fracture compaction experiment showing changes in fracture aperture of a Barnett shale sample under increasing effective stress conditions and through time.
Fig. 6. Optical images from initial shale fracture compaction experiment showing changes in fracture aperture of a Barnett shale sample under increasing effective stress conditions and through time.

In Phase II, laboratory activity also focused on the design, fabrication and testing of a shale fracture compaction visualization cell for use in fracture closure and proppant embedment experiments, Fig. 5. After several design iterations of the X-ray transparent fracture compaction view cell, the system was successfully pressure-tested and verified for optical and X-ray CT visibility of fractured rock samples. Initial laboratory tests were completed to assess fracture closure in shales of varying ductility prior to the introduction of proppant. 

Fig. 7. Preliminary 3-D proppant embedment simulation using the  TOUGH-FLAC simulator.
Fig. 7. Preliminary 3-D proppant embedment simulation using the TOUGH-FLAC simulator.

In initial tests, all shale samples demonstrated large reductions in fracture aperture with time and increased confining pressure, as expected, Fig. 6. In addition, very little shale deformation was observed. With the introduction of proppant, the fracture compaction behavior became more complex—both proppant crushing and proppant embedment during fracture closure were observed. Also, both the Barnett and Marcellus shales exhibited more brittle behavior than was anticipated, based on the shale property characterization. 

Fig. 8. Schematic of grain-scale modeling of proppant embedment for soft and ductile shale of high clay content (left), and hard and brittle shale of lower clay content (right).
Fig. 8. Schematic of grain-scale modeling of proppant embedment for soft and ductile shale of high clay content (left), and hard and brittle shale of lower clay content (right).

Phase II modeling work focused on the development and testing of models to evaluate proppant fate in brittle and ductile clays, Fig. 7. Modeling approaches were developed, based on LBNL’s coupled multi-phase flow and geomechanical codes, TOUGH-FLAC and TOUGH-RBSN. These approaches were tested and used for simulating mechanistic grain to block-scale coupled hydraulics, as well as mechanical interactions in the fracture and adjacent shale matrix. Specifically, for the current research, these approaches were tailored to capture coupled hydraulic and mechanical responses in proppant-filled fractures in shale, based on previous laboratory and field studies reported in the literature, and were refined, based on new laboratory results developed in this project.

The two codes were used to solve similar but complementary problems of proppant deformation/crushing in strong, brittle shale and rock matrix deformation/proppant embedment in ductile shale. TOUGH-RBSN simulations were completed to model discrete fracture propagation and crushing at the high-stress concentration region around the proppant-rock contact in hard, brittle shale. Modeling results confirmed that the RBSN approach is capable of modeling fracture and damage behavior around the matrix-proppant contact, especially in brittle rock. The TOUGH-FLAC simulator was developed and tested to model proppant embedment and clay swelling in soft, ductile shale, Fig. 8. 

Using the TOUGH-FLAC simulator, LBNL has successfully demonstrated: 1) progressive proppant embedment with increasing contact between the shale and proppant involving contact detection in 3D, as well as large strain modeling with continuous updating of the geometric configuration; 2) proppant embedment using elastic and elasto-plastic constitutive models with permanent indentation pattern at the end of the simulation; 3) swelling expansion of the shale matrix when exposed to a change in pressure or changes in saturation, and the effect of swelling on fracture aperture; and (4) creep closure of fractures over several years, with progressive embedment for proppants using visco-elastic model and creep parameters from laboratory data. Block-scale fracture compaction modeling is also underway, with comparisons to recent experiments demonstrating promising results. These models were used successfully to model the laboratory experiments discussed above.  

GOING FORWARD

Phase II of this project ended on Sept. 30, 2018. This research has been extended under a new research project (FWP-FP00008114), which will investigate fracture sustainability in more ductile shales and investigate possible mechanisms to avoid proppant embedment, in order to retain fracture conductivity, ultimately enabling the development of these clay-rich, ductile shales. NETL’s Onshore Unconventional Resources research portfolio is a part of the Laboratory’s Oil and Gas Program, which conducts foundational research to improve the production of the nation’s abundant oil and natural gas resources. For further information on this project, visit https://www.netl.doe.gov/node/2023.  

About the Authors
Jared Ciferno
National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Jared Ciferno is technology manager for the National Energy Technology Laboratory, with oversight for onshore oil and gas, hydrates and midstream research. His experience encompasses a broad spectrum of technology areas, including: fossil fuel electric power generation; advanced gas separation processes; coal conversion processes; engineering model simulation and techno-economic/systems analysis. Prior to joining NETL, Mr. Ciferno served as a research engineer for Calgon Carbon Corporation in Pittsburgh, Pa., where he was responsible for developing new products and processes related to advanced separation and environmental technologies for air and water, including activated carbon, solvent recovery, oxidation technologies (UV and electrochemical) and ion exchange. Mr. Ciferno received his BS and MS degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh.
Related Articles
Connect with World Oil
Connect with World Oil, the upstream industry's most trusted source of forecast data, industry trends, and insights into operational and technological advances.