Drilling the perfect horizontal well requires trade-offs
The personas of engineers and geoscientists are often very different. And when it comes to corporate risk assessment and reward systems, company incentives for these individuals can be counterproductive to meeting corporate objectives, such as attaining the highest IP in a play and achieving superior well performance, as compared to their peer group and competitors. For example, drilling team metrics and service company personnel objectives may be polar-opposite to geology’s goal of attaining pinpoint formation zone landings and then maintaining geologic target objectives to TD (i.e. landing and staying in zone). Consequently, team members often miss corporate goals for achieving the best possible investment results, due to conflicts or unrecognized trade-offs required between departmental domains.
Log in to view this article.
Not yet a subscriber? Find out more and subscribe today!
Already a subscriber but don’t have an online account? Contact our customer service.
*Access will be granted the next business day.
Connect with World Oil
Join Our Newsletter ///
Sign-up for World Oil Daily News
Latest News ///More
- OU geothermal team wins first place in national Department of Energy competition (5/23)
- To avoid windfall tax, UK may ask for quarterly green plans (5/23)
- OEUK: A windfall tax risks reducing the UK’s energy security (5/23)
- Oil steadies as EU stalemate deepens on Russian oil embargo (5/23)
- Russia’s seaborne crude oil exports keep coming (5/23)