United Kingdom: Assessing the real risk in well construction ///
Engineers want certainty in their jobs, and that certainly applies to drilling engineers. They create graphs of costs and times based on projected ROPs, mobilization and performance of equipment and manpower, as well as planning for known contingencies. To plan simply and rationally, they think in terms of known quantities, for example, a graph that represents cumulative costs or progress toward TD. Somewhere in the back of their minds, they are aware that each point on a predictive graph should carry an error bar, that is, some amount of uncertainty – a plus and minus about a point that, in effect, blurs the comforting feeling of a well-made plan.
There's a human need for certainty that causes a psychological phenomena. First, ask an engineer for a value, say, time to TD. Suppose he answers, “42 days.” Then ask him to add a range of uncertainty. Suppose he answers, “38 to 45 days.” Now let's change the ordering of the questions. First, ask him for a range, and then calculate the mean. The mean might stay the same, but it is likely that the range will be wider than when his thought processes began with a commitment to a particular number. Stripped to its essence, this, according to CEO Andrew Paterson, is the idea behind a new breed of software that is helping drilling and oil firms quantify and appreciate the full range of uncertainty that underlies their operations. This software, called P1 (and now, P1v2), is from Aberdeen-based The Peak Group.
Log in to view this article.
Not yet a subscriber? Get started now for immediate access to this content and more.